IPS (In Plane Switching) Panels. Plane Switching panels are consistent in appearance from almost all probable viewing angles. In this respect, they are far superior to most TN panels and better than VA panels. IPS panels are also favored for their innately high-quality color reproduction. In most regards, a monitor with an IPS panel is better But VA is a compromise with the least amount of bad sides. VA have worst pixel response times and more often than not exhibit visible overdrive artifacts, especially on skin tones which have this strange banding effect. VA panels have real struggle switching from black to dark tones and this cause dark streaks. That is, blacks are dark and rich in a VA panel vs. IPS. They also lie somewhere in the middle regarding overall image quality, color reproduction, viewing angle, and refresh rate. Overall, VA is a good compromise between TN and IPS. A drawback of VA vs. IPS and TN is it exhibits an relatively high response time. Vertical Alignment (VA) screens can be even slower than TN models but provide superior black levels and contrast ratios as well as wider viewing angles. In-plane Switching (IPS) panels are the current gold standard for LCD panels, offering very good colour accuracy and viewing angles, along with fast response times. There is not 1 VA or IPS panel. Some IPS panels are bad, some VA are good. If you want to know the specifics of a monitor you really need to see individual reviews of models and the panels they use. OLEDs to me have a chance of burn-in. Have you used them yourself? Can you tell me what they are and how they are with the chance of burn-in? It has three HDMI 2.0 ports and a 60Hz panel, but this TV can output 1080p @ 120Hz and even 1440p @ 120Hz through resolution halving, with a wide VRR range to match. It's hard to notice the degradation in image quality of the resolution halving unless you're looking for it, making this one of the cheapest TVs capable of gaming at 120Hz. nkBedTe. A good example of this is people on the forum that complain of poor screen uniformity on a TV using a VA panel when they view the TV off-axis. Off axis viewing is a definite no-no from a TV using a VA panel. Here's my very own video of my Panasonic TV (FALD VA type panel off axis) - notice the blooming surrounding the bright percentage, bottom Some of the Sony and Samsung models have wide angle filter which can help with this. My general seating is 10-11 feet with a 0- 25 degree view. 30-45 degree max if view if having a concert viewing party or being lazy in the corner seat. Was curious if one seat from center on a VA is more or less equivalent to and IPS view straight on. TN panels have the lowest contrast ratios, often ranging from 600:1 to 1200:1. IPS panels are significantly better, with contrast ratios ranging from 700:1 to 1500:1, although they are still inferior to VA panels. In brief, if you frequently use your computer in a dark room, a VA panel is the only type of LCD panel that can create deep blacks AUO has a panel like that coming out, 4K 144hz and flat. I hope the response times are similar enough that I can simply select that for the moment and wait in the future for other upgrades. Flat VA, with good response times and at a reasonable size, to me will usually be better than IPS. The best VA panels with an 8000:1 native contrast ratio also have some of the worst viewing angles. And the inverse is true as well - applying that compensation film to make the viewing angle wider can drop the contrast back to the old ~3000:1 which has been typical of VA panels for the best part of 15 years. VA viewing angles aren't great, it's a known thing. I think anything over 5 feet, you should be fine. Samsung's QLED is a bit better and would let you sit a bit closer. HTPC: Gigabyte Aorus 15G XC, RTX-3070. Samsung 75" Q90T. Pioneer Elite SC-LX904 w/ Andrew Jones SP-EFS73, Velodyne ULD-18 sub 9.1 Dolby Atmos.

is va panel good for tv